by Richard Akindele » Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:02 pm
Govt Raises Workers' Pay By 25 Percent as NLC Backs Planned
THE Federal Government plans to raise civil servants' salaries by 25 per cent from January next year, even as the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), yesterday, expressed support for the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council (JNPSNC) to embark on a national strike should the Federal Government fail to halt the mass sack in the public service.
Besides, Congress accused government of violating the country's labour laws in its plan to disengage 33,000 workers.
Announcing government's plan to increase workers' salaries in Abuja, NLC President, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, said: "The NLC is happy to note that the Federal Government has decided to increase workers' salaries in the country by 25 percent in January 2007.
"The Federal Government has now accepted to increase wages by 25 per cent once this exercise is over. We welcome this increase although it is coming three years after it had been negotiated by the NLC under the Chief Philip Asiodu Panel.
"If the agreed 25 per cent increase in 2001 and the subsequent 15 per cent increase in 2002 had been implemented, the system would have eventually returned to single digit and routine wage adjustments. Even with this increase and the previous 12.5 per cent, government still needs to increase wages further to put the public sector wage regime on the part of relativity with the private sector."
Congress, however, kicked against Federal Government's decision, to borrow N50 billion from the World Bank to finance the settlement of gratuities of workers to be sacked.
According to Oshiomhole, "any spending on this must be drawn from within the system through the reserves. Borrowing to retrench is unproductive. The N50 billion loan being contemplated in addition to other cases of piece meal external borrowing is capable of taking the nation back to the dark days of debt overhang. If we must borrow, it must be for productive capital projects, which this retrenchment is not."
Strike
On its plan to lead the total strike against the mass sack, Oshiomhole said: "In the NEC of the NLC, a decision was taken to review the situation and the meeting decided to strategise on how the Congress can support the efforts of the affiliate unions in the public sector to stop the mass sack, especially as due process was not followed in reaching that decision.
"The unions in the public sector have canvassed valid arguments against the approach of the Federal Government to this retrenchment and have issued an ultimatum to back up a demand for the convening of a meeting with government. The NLC endorses the concerns canvassed by the public sector unions."
He, however, said the NLC remained alarmed by the large number of civil servants to be affected, saying: "Offloading such a large number of persons into the unemployment market in one fell swoop at this time is certainly not in the national interest. The shocks this retrenchment will create are bound to compound the poverty and unemployment levels. For a country that faces a serious and unprecedented unemployment crisis, rationality in polity making requires that the overall employment level should not be further eroded.
"The logic of demand and supply should convince even the most incurable market fundamentalists that 33,000 additional entrants into the job market would create unmitigated shocks.
"The private sector is currently not absorbing labour. Indeed, the private sector is shedding labour because of the harsh business environment compounded by the dumping of imported products, affecting the market share of local producers.
"The evidence also shows that the small scale sector and self employed operators in the economy are not doing well, which calls to question the labour absorbing capacity of the informal sector.
"Therefore, there is no expectation that those to be retrenched will find jobs in the private sector even if the Federal Government were to implement the promised retraining programme.
"In the light of the serious level of unemployment, this kind of redundancy agenda requires a phased approach that is driven by sensitivity to the overall socio-economic impact.
"In poverty terms, retrenching 33,000 civil servants will have implications for the survival of an additional 231,000 spouses and children as well as about 100,000 extended family dependents.
"It will also lead to higher mortality, worsen the school dropout ratio, escalate social tension, increase the crime rate and exacerbate such social dysfunctions like prostitution as coping strategies among young dependants," he said.
Vanguard.